Vhcleaner review

Topic created by Footluv7777
on Tue, 17 Dec 2024 at 04:35

Footluv7777 said on Tue, 17 Dec 2024 at 04:35...

After all the good things I heard about vhcleaners, I decided I had to try a bottle. The day I received the bottle I was so excited to try it. I usually start my play sessions with my shower hose enema attachment. As I flush i like to hit the poppers, and this day was no different. I have to admit my expectations were really high, and I took two big hits from the bottle. I waited for that familiar buildup and high and it did not come. So I took two more big hits, and Still nothing. At this point I was getting disappointed. So I thought fuck it I will just stay on the bottle and after probably another six hits, I finally started to feel the affects kicking in. But they were very subtle, and I must have hit the bottle at least 20 times that night. I got a little loopy but not what I was looking for. The second night I tried to use them, it was about the same, a slight dizziness was about all I got out of it. Tonight I tried them again, but this time I used the sock method. This was a completely different experience. I was able to get properly fucked up on them, and ravaged my ass with some of the largest toys I have ever used. I buried one of my longest toys over 28" inside of me using j-lube. It was truly a fantastic time and edged myself for four hours covering myself in j-lube before allowing myself to cum. I hit the poppers too many times to count and by the end I was a complete mess physically and mentally. It took a good 15 minutes before my head cleared and I was back to normal. With that being said I would say for me the only way I would use vhcleaner is by the sock method. They still are not the strongest or most enjoyable poppers I have ever used but it was interesting to try something different. The next poppers i want to try are Iron Fist and Everest from poppersaromas.
What do you guys think of Iron Fist? Is it worth a try?

Elvis said on Tue, 17 Dec 2024 at 19:05...

I like putting a cotton ball in the bottom of a large vitamin bottle and squirting some VHCleaner PL-100 in there. Then closing the lid and allowing the vapors to build. And after finishing, I'm the same. It literally takes me 5-10 minutes before I can think clearly.

Gym said on Tue, 24 Dec 2024 at 19:42...

@Footluv7777

Thanks for your review of VHC although you didn't say which one you bought, the PL-100 or the PL-200. Anyway, I will be trying the PL-100 myself soon and will report back here after having done so.

At the end of your comment, you wrote, "The next poppers i want to try are Iron Fist and Everest from poppersaromas. What do you guys think of Iron Fist? Is it worth a try? "

All due respect, these are dumb questions to ask without knowing exactly which formula(s) you are thinking of buying.

There are so many different types of Iron Fist and Everest on the market, you absolutely need to make your purchase decisions based on which formula is inside the bottle -- in other words, is it amyl? is it pentyl? is it isopropyl? it is a mixture of any of those? and what are their CAS numbers, if possible -- and not just go by the brand name on the outside of the bottle.

For example, on the poppersaromas website, IRON FIST Amyl 24ml and Everest Hard Fist 24ml are both showing as a "stabilised isoamyl nitrite mixture" formula, and their product details and CAS number are exactly the same as well (CAS 110-46-3) + (CAS 123-51-3).

That tells you that there's no difference whatsoever between IRON FIST Amyl 24ml and Everest Hard Fist 24ml. The formulas for each of those solvents are exactly the same. It's just the brand name that is different, which is a very simple marketing tool for sellers to be able to sell more of the exact same product to uninformed consumers who think they are getting a different and/or better and/or stronger product.

Bottom line: Consumers absolutely need to focus on the actual formula (CAS number if possible) inside the bottle, and not the brand name/label stuck on the outside of it.

Squirtle said on Tue, 24 Dec 2024 at 20:19...

Do you really think there is no variation between manufacturers and batches? Extent of reaction and byproducts are not defined by the CAS of major components.

Gym said on Tue, 24 Dec 2024 at 20:25...

lol

Gym said on Tue, 24 Dec 2024 at 20:44...

"Do you really think there is no variation between manufacturers and batches?"

Your comments are laughable.

On the poppersaromas website, the IRON FIST Amyl 24ml and Everest Hard Fist 24ml poppers, both showing as the exact same "stabilised isoamyl nitrite mixture" formula, with the exact same (CAS 110-46-3) + (CAS 123-51-3), are from the exact same manufacturer. Why would anyone in their right mind think that these two poppers are different in any way?!

Again, IRON FIST Amyl 24ml and Everest Hard Fist 24ml are the exact same product but in different bottles. The manufacturer does this for marketing purposes, to sell more product, knowing that most of their consumers are low-information idiots. All the different poppers manufacturers do this. They do it to maximize their profits.

Am I talking to a 5 year old?

I'll be waiting for your next dumb comment. smh

Squirtle said on Tue, 24 Dec 2024 at 20:55...

It is better to be dumb than ignorant of that fact. I have had enough of you.

Danmelbourne said on Wed, 1 Jan 2025 at 11:08...

The testing is now five years old but Australia’s Therapeutic Goods Administration did random testing on poppers and found the CAS numbers often don’t match the contents unfortunately. https://www.tga.gov.au/resources/publication/tga-laboratory-testing-reports/testing-alkyl-nitrite-poppers

Gym said on Wed, 1 Jan 2025 at 19:03...

@Danmelbourne

Not surprising at all. That being said, I don't believe I've ever insinuated that manufacturers or vendors should be ever trusted for what's written on their bottles and/or for what's written on their websites. Quite the contrary. I believe that most current manufacturers, as well as vendors, should not be blindly trusted.

And consistent with my above statement (that manufacturers and vendors should not be blindly trusted), the only point I've ever tried to make in this thread has always been that consumers should not be imagining that different brands, with the exact same formula and/or CAS listed for those brands and coming from the exact same manufacturer, are any different from each other.

In a poppers industry where large quantities of ready-made formula can be easily purchased (for example, from China and India) and where there is basically zero government regulation no matter what country a consumer lives in, we should be able to agree on the idea that poppers manufacturers/vendors/sellers should never be blindly trusted.

Examples of bulk formulas available:

https://zhishangchemical.en.made-in-china.com/product/LwoAaiPJaGks/China-High-Quality-Pentyl-Nitrite-CAS-463-04-7-with-Best-Price.html

https://www.zehaochem.com/pentyl-nitrite-cas-463-04-7.html

https://www.lookchem.com/cas-123/123-51-3.html

Poon said on Wed, 1 Jan 2025 at 20:30...

lol Methany.

Elvis said on Tue, 7 Jan 2025 at 15:23...

I've read many reviews where users prefer the PL-100 over the PL-200. I've tried both and could not tell much of a difference between the two.

Squirtle said on Wed, 8 Jan 2025 at 21:29...

Have you compared CAS numbers? Lmao